Elektronische Laborbücher: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Forschungsdaten.org
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Zeile 14: Zeile 14:


== Scientific literature ==
== Scientific literature ==
* Dirnagl, Ulrich, and Ingo Przesdzing. “A Pocket Guide to Electronic Laboratory Notebooks in the Academic Life Sciences.” F1000Research, January 4, 2016. [http://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7628.1].
* Dirnagl, Ulrich, and Ingo Przesdzing. “A Pocket Guide to Electronic Laboratory Notebooks in the Academic Life Sciences.” F1000Research, 2016. [http://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7628.1]
* Nussbeck, Sara Y., Philipp Weil, Julia Menzel, Bartlomiej Marzec, Kai Lorberg, and Blanche Schwappach. “The Laboratory Notebook in the 21st Century: The Electronic Laboratory Notebook Would Enhance Good Scientific Practice and Increase Research Productivity.” EMBO Reports 15, no. 6 2014: 631–34. [http://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201338358]


== Mailing lists ==
== Mailing lists ==

Version vom 17. September 2018, 10:20 Uhr

Synonyme

Web resources

Scientific literature

  • Dirnagl, Ulrich, and Ingo Przesdzing. “A Pocket Guide to Electronic Laboratory Notebooks in the Academic Life Sciences.” F1000Research, 2016. [4]
  • Nussbeck, Sara Y., Philipp Weil, Julia Menzel, Bartlomiej Marzec, Kai Lorberg, and Blanche Schwappach. “The Laboratory Notebook in the 21st Century: The Electronic Laboratory Notebook Would Enhance Good Scientific Practice and Increase Research Productivity.” EMBO Reports 15, no. 6 2014: 631–34. [5]

Mailing lists

In Germany exist at least two ELN Mailing lists: